Medama vs Swetrix
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted web analytics options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Medama
Privacy-focused website analytics with no cookies
VS
Swetrix
Privacy-focused, cookieless web analytics service
| Feature | Medama | Swetrix |
|---|---|---|
| Deploy effort | Under-an-hour setup | Under-an-hour setup |
| Health score | 74 · Good | 83 · Excellent |
| Category | Web Analytics | Web Analytics |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Language | Go | TypeScript |
| Setup difficulty | Easy | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 128 MB | 512 MB |
| Deployment | docker, binary | docker |
| GitHub stars | ★ 645 | ★ 1,202 |
| First released | 2024 | 2021 |
| Replaces | Google Analytics | Google Analytics |
What are Medama and Swetrix?
Medama
Medama is a lightweight, privacy-focused website analytics tool that operates without cookies and complies with privacy regulations. It is designed to be fast and simple to self-host.
- Cookieless tracking
- SQLite storage
- Lightweight script
- Privacy compliant
Swetrix
Swetrix is an open-source, privacy-focused web analytics platform that is fully cookieless and GDPR compliant. It tracks page views, user flows, and custom events without identifying visitors.
- Cookieless tracking
- User flow analysis
- Custom events
- Performance metrics
Medama vs Swetrix: key differences
Medama is written in Go, while Swetrix is built with TypeScript. Licensing differs — MIT for Medama versus AGPL-3.0 for Swetrix. Medama is the lighter option, starting around 128 MB of RAM against 512 MB for Swetrix. Swetrix is the more established project (first released 2021), while Medama arrived in 2024.
Why pick each one
Choose Medama if…
- Easy single-binary deploy
- Very lightweight
Watch out for
- Newer project
- Smaller feature set
Choose Swetrix if…
- No cookie banner needed
- Detailed flow reports
Watch out for
- Needs ClickHouse and Redis
- Setup is multi-component
Frequently asked questions
Is Medama or Swetrix better?
Neither is universally better. Swetrix has the larger community, while Medama is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.
Are Medama and Swetrix free and open-source?
Yes. Medama is licensed under MIT and Swetrix under AGPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Medama and Swetrix with Docker?
Medama: yes. Swetrix: yes.
Which is lighter on resources, Medama or Swetrix?
Medama has the smaller minimum footprint at 128 MB of RAM, compared to about 512 MB for Swetrix. Real-world usage depends on library size, user count, and enabled features.