Medama vs Swetrix
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted web analytics options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Medama
Privacy-focused website analytics with no cookies
VS
Swetrix
Privacy-focused, cookieless web analytics service
| Feature | Medama | Swetrix |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Web Analytics | Web Analytics |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Language | Go | TypeScript |
| Setup difficulty | Easy | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 128 MB | 512 MB |
| Deployment | docker, binary | docker |
| GitHub stars | ★ 636 | ★ 1,112 |
| First released | 2024 | 2021 |
| Replaces | Google Analytics | Google Analytics |
Why pick each one
Frequently asked questions
Is Medama or Swetrix better?
Neither is universally better. Swetrix has the larger community, while Medama is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.
Are Medama and Swetrix free and open-source?
Yes. Medama is licensed under MIT and Swetrix under AGPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Medama and Swetrix with Docker?
Medama: yes. Swetrix: yes.