Medama vs Rybbit
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted web analytics options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Medama
Privacy-focused website analytics with no cookies
VS
Rybbit
Open-source, privacy-friendly Google Analytics alternative
| Feature | Medama | Rybbit |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Web Analytics | Web Analytics |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Language | Go | TypeScript |
| Setup difficulty | Easy | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 128 MB | 512 MB |
| Deployment | docker, binary | docker |
| GitHub stars | ★ 636 | ★ 12,589 |
| First released | 2024 | 2024 |
| Replaces | Google Analytics | Google Analytics, Mixpanel |
Why pick each one
Frequently asked questions
Is Medama or Rybbit better?
Neither is universally better. Rybbit has the larger community, while Medama is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.
Are Medama and Rybbit free and open-source?
Yes. Medama is licensed under MIT and Rybbit under AGPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Medama and Rybbit with Docker?
Medama: yes. Rybbit: yes.