Medama vs Rybbit
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted web analytics options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Medama
Privacy-focused website analytics with no cookies
VS
Rybbit
Open-source, privacy-friendly Google Analytics alternative
| Feature | Medama | Rybbit |
|---|---|---|
| Deploy effort | Under-an-hour setup | Under-an-hour setup |
| Health score | 74 · Good | 94 · Excellent |
| Category | Web Analytics | Web Analytics |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Language | Go | TypeScript |
| Setup difficulty | Easy | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 128 MB | 512 MB |
| Deployment | docker, binary | docker |
| GitHub stars | ★ 645 | ★ 13,061 |
| First released | 2024 | 2024 |
| Replaces | Google Analytics | Google Analytics, Mixpanel |
What are Medama and Rybbit?
Medama
Medama is a lightweight, privacy-focused website analytics tool that operates without cookies and complies with privacy regulations. It is designed to be fast and simple to self-host.
- Cookieless tracking
- SQLite storage
- Lightweight script
- Privacy compliant
Rybbit
Rybbit is an open-source and privacy-friendly web and product analytics platform. It is cookieless, GDPR compliant, and offers an intuitive dashboard for tracking traffic and user behavior.
- Cookieless and GDPR compliant
- Real-time dashboard
- Funnels and user journeys
- Web and product analytics
Medama vs Rybbit: key differences
Medama is written in Go, while Rybbit is built with TypeScript. Licensing differs — MIT for Medama versus AGPL-3.0 for Rybbit. Medama is the lighter option, starting around 128 MB of RAM against 512 MB for Rybbit. Rybbit has the considerably larger community, at 13,061 GitHub stars versus 645.
Why pick each one
Choose Medama if…
- Easy single-binary deploy
- Very lightweight
Watch out for
- Newer project
- Smaller feature set
Choose Rybbit if…
- Modern intuitive UI
- Combines web and product analytics
Watch out for
- Newer project
- Requires ClickHouse
Frequently asked questions
Is Medama or Rybbit better?
Neither is universally better. Rybbit has the larger community, while Medama is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.
Are Medama and Rybbit free and open-source?
Yes. Medama is licensed under MIT and Rybbit under AGPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Medama and Rybbit with Docker?
Medama: yes. Rybbit: yes.
Which is lighter on resources, Medama or Rybbit?
Medama has the smaller minimum footprint at 128 MB of RAM, compared to about 512 MB for Rybbit. Real-world usage depends on library size, user count, and enabled features.