Magic Wormhole vs Rclone

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted apps from related categories — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureMagic WormholeRclone
CategoryFile Sync & StorageBackup & Recovery
LicenseMITMIT
LanguagePythonGo
Setup difficultyEasyMedium
Min. RAM32 MB128 MB
Deploymentbinarybinary, docker
GitHub stars★ 22,792★ 58,995
First released20162014
ReplacesWeTransfer, AirDropBackblaze

Why pick each one

Choose Magic Wormhole if…

  • Released under the MIT license
  • Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
  • Mature project with 22.8k GitHub stars
  • Written in Python
Magic Wormhole details

Choose Rclone if…

  • Works with almost any cloud
  • Extremely versatile
  • Reliable
Rclone details

Frequently asked questions

Is Magic Wormhole or Rclone better?

Neither is universally better. Rclone has the larger community, while Magic Wormhole is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.

Are Magic Wormhole and Rclone free and open-source?

Yes. Magic Wormhole is licensed under MIT and Rclone under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Magic Wormhole and Rclone with Docker?

Magic Wormhole: check the project docs for container support. Rclone: yes.

Related comparisons