CKAN vs Magic Wormhole

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted apps from related categories — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureCKANMagic Wormhole
CategoryBackup & RecoveryFile Sync & Storage
LicenseAGPL-3.0MIT
LanguagePythonPython
Setup difficultyMediumEasy
Min. RAM512 MB32 MB
Deploymentbare-metalbinary
GitHub stars★ 5,088★ 22,792
First released20262016
ReplacesWeTransfer, AirDrop

Why pick each one

Choose CKAN if…

  • Released under the AGPL-3.0 license
  • Mature project with 5.1k GitHub stars
  • Written in Python
  • Lightweight — runs in 512 MB RAM
CKAN details

Choose Magic Wormhole if…

  • Released under the MIT license
  • Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
  • Mature project with 22.8k GitHub stars
  • Written in Python
Magic Wormhole details

Frequently asked questions

Is CKAN or Magic Wormhole better?

Magic Wormhole is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider CKAN if its specific feature set fits your needs better.

Are CKAN and Magic Wormhole free and open-source?

Yes. CKAN is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and Magic Wormhole under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run CKAN and Magic Wormhole with Docker?

CKAN: check the project docs for container support. Magic Wormhole: check the project docs for container support.

Related comparisons