Lufi vs Nextcloud

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted file sync & storage options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureLufiNextcloud
CategoryFile Sync & StorageFile Sync & Storage
LicenseAGPL-3.0AGPL-3.0
LanguagePerlPHP
Setup difficultyMediumMedium
Min. RAM128 MB512 MB
Deploymentdocker, bare-metaldocker, bare-metal, snap
GitHub stars★ 300★ 36,362
First released20152016
ReplacesWeTransfer, Firefox SendDropbox, Google Drive, Microsoft 365

Why pick each one

Choose Lufi if…

  • Released under the AGPL-3.0 license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Written in Perl
  • Tiny footprint — runs in 128 MB RAM
Lufi details

Choose Nextcloud if…

  • Feature-rich and extensible
  • Active development and large community
  • Integrates calendar, contacts and office
Nextcloud details

Frequently asked questions

Is Lufi or Nextcloud better?

Neither is universally better. Nextcloud has the larger community; both share a medium setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.

Are Lufi and Nextcloud free and open-source?

Yes. Lufi is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and Nextcloud under AGPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Lufi and Nextcloud with Docker?

Lufi: yes. Nextcloud: yes.

Related comparisons