Logto vs node-oidc-provider

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted identity & sso options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureLogtonode-oidc-provider
CategoryIdentity & SSOIdentity & SSO
LicenseMPL-2.0MIT
LanguageTypeScriptJavaScript
Setup difficultyMediumHard
Min. RAM512 MB256 MB
Deploymentdocker, kubernetes, binarysource, docker
GitHub stars★ 14,305★ 3,788
First released20222016
ReplacesAuth0, Firebase Auth, ClerkAuth0, Okta

Why pick each one

Choose Logto if…

  • Great developer experience
  • Modern UI and SDKs
Logto details

Choose node-oidc-provider if…

  • Released under the MIT license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Active community (3.8k GitHub stars)
  • Written in JavaScript
node-oidc-provider details

Frequently asked questions

Is Logto or node-oidc-provider better?

Logto is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler medium setup. Consider node-oidc-provider if its specific feature set fits your needs better.

Are Logto and node-oidc-provider free and open-source?

Yes. Logto is licensed under MPL-2.0 and node-oidc-provider under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Logto and node-oidc-provider with Docker?

Logto: yes. node-oidc-provider: yes.

Related comparisons