Lidarr vs Tempo
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted media servers options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Lidarr
Music collection manager and download automation tool
VS
Tempo
Material You Subsonic music client for Android
| Feature | Lidarr | Tempo |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Media Servers | Media Servers |
| License | GPL-3.0 | GPL-3.0 |
| Language | C# | Java |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Easy |
| Min. RAM | 512 MB | 128 MB |
| Deployment | docker, bare-metal | binary, source |
| GitHub stars | ★ 5,531 | ★ 2,220 |
| First released | 2017 | 2022 |
| Replaces | Spotify | Spotify, Plexamp |
Why pick each one
Frequently asked questions
Is Lidarr or Tempo better?
Neither is universally better. Lidarr has the larger community, while Tempo is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.
Are Lidarr and Tempo free and open-source?
Yes. Lidarr is licensed under GPL-3.0 and Tempo under GPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Lidarr and Tempo with Docker?
Lidarr: yes. Tempo: check the project docs for container support.