Airsonic-Advanced vs Tempo
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted media servers options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Airsonic-Advanced
Community-driven music streaming server
VS
Tempo
Material You Subsonic music client for Android
| Feature | Airsonic-Advanced | Tempo |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Media Servers | Media Servers |
| License | GPL-3.0 | GPL-3.0 |
| Language | JavaScript | Java |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Easy |
| Min. RAM | 512 MB | 128 MB |
| Deployment | docker, bare-metal | binary, source |
| GitHub stars | ★ 1,402 | ★ 2,220 |
| First released | 2019 | 2022 |
| Replaces | Spotify | Spotify, Plexamp |
Why pick each one
Choose Airsonic-Advanced if…
- Works with many clients
- Mature feature set
- Multi-user
Frequently asked questions
Is Airsonic-Advanced or Tempo better?
Tempo is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider Airsonic-Advanced if its specific feature set fits your needs better.
Are Airsonic-Advanced and Tempo free and open-source?
Yes. Airsonic-Advanced is licensed under GPL-3.0 and Tempo under GPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Airsonic-Advanced and Tempo with Docker?
Airsonic-Advanced: yes. Tempo: check the project docs for container support.