Amperfy vs Lidarr
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted media servers options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Amperfy
iOS music streaming client for Ampache and Subsonic
VS
Lidarr
Music collection manager and download automation tool
| Feature | Amperfy | Lidarr |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Media Servers | Media Servers |
| License | GPL-3.0 | GPL-3.0 |
| Language | Swift | C# |
| Setup difficulty | Easy | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 128 MB | 512 MB |
| Deployment | binary, source | docker, bare-metal |
| GitHub stars | ★ 1,678 | ★ 5,531 |
| First released | 2021 | 2017 |
| Replaces | Spotify, Apple Music | Spotify |
Why pick each one
Frequently asked questions
Is Amperfy or Lidarr better?
Neither is universally better. Lidarr has the larger community, while Amperfy is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.
Are Amperfy and Lidarr free and open-source?
Yes. Amperfy is licensed under GPL-3.0 and Lidarr under GPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Amperfy and Lidarr with Docker?
Amperfy: check the project docs for container support. Lidarr: yes.