Smokeping vs Uptime Kuma

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted monitoring & status options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureSmokepingUptime Kuma
CategoryMonitoring & StatusMonitoring & Status
LicenseGPL-2.0MIT
LanguagePerlJavaScript
Setup difficultyMediumEasy
Min. RAM128 MB256 MB
Deploymentbare-metal, docker, sourcedocker
GitHub stars★ 1,938★ 89,960
First released20032021
ReplacesPRTGPingdom, UptimeRobot

Why pick each one

Choose Smokeping if…

  • Excellent for connection quality
  • Lightweight
Smokeping details

Choose Uptime Kuma if…

  • Very easy to use
  • Great notifications
  • Lightweight
Uptime Kuma details

Frequently asked questions

Is Smokeping or Uptime Kuma better?

Uptime Kuma is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider Smokeping if its specific feature set fits your needs better.

Are Smokeping and Uptime Kuma free and open-source?

Yes. Smokeping is licensed under GPL-2.0 and Uptime Kuma under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Smokeping and Uptime Kuma with Docker?

Smokeping: yes. Uptime Kuma: yes.

Related comparisons