Grafana k6 vs Smokeping

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted monitoring & status options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureGrafana k6Smokeping
CategoryMonitoring & StatusMonitoring & Status
LicenseAGPL-3.0GPL-2.0
LanguageGoPerl
Setup difficultyMediumMedium
Min. RAM256 MB128 MB
Deploymentdocker, binary, bare-metalbare-metal, docker, source
GitHub stars★ 31,211★ 1,938
First released20172003
ReplacesLoadRunner, BlazeMeterPRTG

Why pick each one

Choose Grafana k6 if…

  • Developer-friendly scripting
  • Great CI integration
Grafana k6 details

Choose Smokeping if…

  • Excellent for connection quality
  • Lightweight
Smokeping details

Frequently asked questions

Is Grafana k6 or Smokeping better?

Neither is universally better. Grafana k6 has the larger community; both share a medium setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.

Are Grafana k6 and Smokeping free and open-source?

Yes. Grafana k6 is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and Smokeping under GPL-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Grafana k6 and Smokeping with Docker?

Grafana k6: yes. Smokeping: yes.

Related comparisons