Kup vs Restic

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted backup & recovery options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureKupRestic
CategoryBackup & RecoveryBackup & Recovery
LicenseGPL-2.0BSD-2-Clause
LanguageC++Go
Setup difficultyEasyMedium
Min. RAM128 MB256 MB
Deploymentbinarybinary, docker
GitHub stars★ 100★ 35,412
First released20122015
ReplacesTime MachineBackblaze, Carbonite

Why pick each one

Choose Kup if…

  • Released under the GPL-2.0 license
  • Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
  • Written in C++
  • Tiny footprint — runs in 128 MB RAM
Kup details

Choose Restic if…

  • Strong encryption
  • Efficient deduplication
  • Wide backend support
Restic details

Frequently asked questions

Is Kup or Restic better?

Neither is universally better. Restic has the larger community, while Kup is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.

Are Kup and Restic free and open-source?

Yes. Kup is licensed under GPL-2.0 and Restic under BSD-2-Clause. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Kup and Restic with Docker?

Kup: check the project docs for container support. Restic: yes.

Related comparisons