btrbk vs Restic

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted backup & recovery options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeaturebtrbkRestic
CategoryBackup & RecoveryBackup & Recovery
LicenseGPL-3.0BSD-2-Clause
LanguagePerlGo
Setup difficultyMediumMedium
Min. RAM64 MB256 MB
Deploymentbare-metal, binarybinary, docker
GitHub stars★ 2,125★ 35,412
First released20142015
ReplacesTime MachineBackblaze, Carbonite

Why pick each one

Choose btrbk if…

  • Released under the GPL-3.0 license
  • Active community (2.1k GitHub stars)
  • Written in Perl
  • Tiny footprint — runs in 64 MB RAM
btrbk details

Choose Restic if…

  • Strong encryption
  • Efficient deduplication
  • Wide backend support
Restic details

Frequently asked questions

Is btrbk or Restic better?

Neither is universally better. Restic has the larger community; both share a medium setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.

Are btrbk and Restic free and open-source?

Yes. btrbk is licensed under GPL-3.0 and Restic under BSD-2-Clause. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run btrbk and Restic with Docker?

btrbk: check the project docs for container support. Restic: yes.

Related comparisons