btrbk vs bup

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted backup & recovery options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
Featurebtrbkbup
Deploy effortRead-the-docs projectRead-the-docs project
Health score78 · Good89 · Excellent
CategoryBackup & RecoveryBackup & Recovery
LicenseGPL-3.0LGPL-2.1
LanguagePerlPython
Setup difficultyMediumMedium
Min. RAM64 MB128 MB
Deploymentbare-metal, binarybinary
GitHub stars★ 2,155★ 7,355
First released20142010
ReplacesTime MachineTime Machine

What are btrbk and bup?

btrbk

btrbk is a backup tool for creating and managing snapshots of Btrfs subvolumes and replicating them to local or remote targets. It is designed for incremental, atomic backups driven by a simple configuration file.

  • Incremental Btrfs backups
  • Remote replication over SSH
  • Configurable retention
  • Atomic snapshots

bup

bup is a backup tool that stores data using the git packfile format with rolling-checksum deduplication. It can back up enormous datasets efficiently and incrementally.

  • Git-packfile storage format
  • Rolling-checksum deduplication
  • Handles very large datasets

btrbk vs bup: key differences

Btrbk is written in Perl, while bup is built with Python. Licensing differs — GPL-3.0 for btrbk versus LGPL-2.1 for bup. Btrbk is the lighter option, starting around 64 MB of RAM against 128 MB for bup. Bup is the more established project (first released 2010), while btrbk arrived in 2014. Bup has the considerably larger community, at 7,355 GitHub stars versus 2,155.

Why pick each one

Choose btrbk if…

  • Released under the GPL-3.0 license
  • Active community (2.2k GitHub stars)
  • Written in Perl
  • Tiny footprint — runs in 64 MB RAM

Watch out for

  • Btrfs only
  • No graphical interface
btrbk details

Choose bup if…

  • Released under the LGPL-2.1 license
  • Mature project with 7.4k GitHub stars
  • Written in Python
  • Tiny footprint — runs in 128 MB RAM
bup details

Frequently asked questions

Is btrbk or bup better?

Neither is universally better. bup has the larger community; both share a medium setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.

Are btrbk and bup free and open-source?

Yes. btrbk is licensed under GPL-3.0 and bup under LGPL-2.1. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run btrbk and bup with Docker?

btrbk: check the project docs for container support. bup: check the project docs for container support.

Which is lighter on resources, btrbk or bup?

btrbk has the smaller minimum footprint at 64 MB of RAM, compared to about 128 MB for bup. Real-world usage depends on library size, user count, and enabled features.

Related comparisons