Kopia vs Restic alt MiniBackup
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted backup & recovery options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Kopia
Fast, encrypted backup with a clean interface
VS
Restic alt MiniBackup
Self-hosted backup orchestration for Restic repositories
| Feature | Kopia | Restic alt MiniBackup |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Backup & Recovery | Backup & Recovery |
| License | Apache-2.0 | GPL-3.0 |
| Language | Go | Go |
| Setup difficulty | Easy | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 256 MB | 64 MB |
| Deployment | binary, docker | binary |
| GitHub stars | ★ 13,798 | ★ 1,381 |
| First released | 2019 | 2019 |
| Replaces | Backblaze, Carbonite | Backblaze |
Why pick each one
Choose Restic alt MiniBackup if…
- Released under the GPL-3.0 license
- Active community (1.4k GitHub stars)
- Written in Go
- Tiny footprint — runs in 64 MB RAM
Frequently asked questions
Is Kopia or Restic alt MiniBackup better?
Kopia is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider Restic alt MiniBackup if its specific feature set fits your needs better.
Are Kopia and Restic alt MiniBackup free and open-source?
Yes. Kopia is licensed under Apache-2.0 and Restic alt MiniBackup under GPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Kopia and Restic alt MiniBackup with Docker?
Kopia: yes. Restic alt MiniBackup: check the project docs for container support.