Barman vs Kopia

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted backup & recovery options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureBarmanKopia
CategoryBackup & RecoveryBackup & Recovery
LicenseGPL-3.0Apache-2.0
LanguagePythonGo
Setup difficultyHardEasy
Min. RAM256 MB256 MB
Deploymentbare-metalbinary, docker
GitHub stars★ 3,214★ 13,798
First released20122019
ReplacesVeeamBackblaze, Carbonite

Why pick each one

Choose Barman if…

  • Released under the GPL-3.0 license
  • Active community (3.2k GitHub stars)
  • Written in Python
  • Tiny footprint — runs in 256 MB RAM
Barman details

Choose Kopia if…

  • GUI and CLI both available
  • Fast and efficient
  • Modern design
Kopia details

Frequently asked questions

Is Barman or Kopia better?

Kopia is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider Barman if its specific feature set fits your needs better.

Are Barman and Kopia free and open-source?

Yes. Barman is licensed under GPL-3.0 and Kopia under Apache-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Barman and Kopia with Docker?

Barman: check the project docs for container support. Kopia: yes.

Related comparisons