Kopia vs SeaweedFS

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted apps from related categories — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureKopiaSeaweedFS
CategoryBackup & RecoveryFile Sync & Storage
LicenseApache-2.0Apache-2.0
LanguageGoGo
Setup difficultyEasyHard
Min. RAM256 MB512 MB
Deploymentbinary, dockerdocker, kubernetes, binary
GitHub stars★ 13,798★ 33,952
First released20192015
ReplacesBackblaze, CarboniteAmazon S3

Why pick each one

Choose Kopia if…

  • GUI and CLI both available
  • Fast and efficient
  • Modern design
Kopia details

Choose SeaweedFS if…

  • Released under the Apache-2.0 license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Kubernetes-ready with Helm charts available
  • Mature project with 34k GitHub stars
SeaweedFS details

Frequently asked questions

Is Kopia or SeaweedFS better?

Neither is universally better. SeaweedFS has the larger community, while Kopia is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.

Are Kopia and SeaweedFS free and open-source?

Yes. Kopia is licensed under Apache-2.0 and SeaweedFS under Apache-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Kopia and SeaweedFS with Docker?

Kopia: yes. SeaweedFS: yes.

Related comparisons