Kopia vs Puter

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted apps from related categories — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureKopiaPuter
CategoryBackup & RecoveryFile Sync & Storage
LicenseApache-2.0AGPL-3.0
LanguageGoTypeScript
Setup difficultyEasyMedium
Min. RAM256 MB512 MB
Deploymentbinary, dockerdocker
GitHub stars★ 13,798★ 43,003
First released20192026
ReplacesBackblaze, Carbonite

Why pick each one

Choose Kopia if…

  • GUI and CLI both available
  • Fast and efficient
  • Modern design
Kopia details

Choose Puter if…

  • Released under the AGPL-3.0 license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Mature project with 43k GitHub stars
  • Written in TypeScript
Puter details

Frequently asked questions

Is Kopia or Puter better?

Neither is universally better. Puter has the larger community, while Kopia is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.

Are Kopia and Puter free and open-source?

Yes. Kopia is licensed under Apache-2.0 and Puter under AGPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Kopia and Puter with Docker?

Kopia: yes. Puter: yes.

Related comparisons