SHSelfHostIndex

Bupstash vs Backblaze alt Kopia-UI Standalone

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted backup & recovery options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
BU Bupstash Easy and efficient encrypted backups VS BA Backblaze alt Kopia-UI Standalone Cross-platform backup tool with deduplication and encryption
FeatureBupstashBackblaze alt Kopia-UI Standalone
CategoryBackup & RecoveryBackup & Recovery
LicenseMITGPL-3.0
LanguageRustRust
Setup difficultyMediumEasy
Min. RAM128 MB256 MB
Deploymentbinarybinary
GitHub stars★ 924★ 500
First released20202020
ReplacesBackblaze, CrashPlanTime Machine, Backblaze

Why pick each one

Choose Bupstash if…

  • Released under the MIT license
  • Written in Rust
  • Tiny footprint — runs in 128 MB RAM
Bupstash details

Choose Backblaze alt Kopia-UI Standalone if…

  • Released under the GPL-3.0 license
  • Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
  • Written in Rust
  • Tiny footprint — runs in 256 MB RAM
Backblaze alt Kopia-UI Standalone details

Frequently asked questions

Is Bupstash or Backblaze alt Kopia-UI Standalone better?

Neither is universally better. Bupstash has the larger community, while Backblaze alt Kopia-UI Standalone is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.

Are Bupstash and Backblaze alt Kopia-UI Standalone free and open-source?

Yes. Bupstash is licensed under MIT and Backblaze alt Kopia-UI Standalone under GPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Bupstash and Backblaze alt Kopia-UI Standalone with Docker?

Bupstash: check the project docs for container support. Backblaze alt Kopia-UI Standalone: check the project docs for container support.

Related comparisons