Kerberos Agent vs RTSPtoWebRTC
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted video surveillance options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Kerberos Agent
Lightweight video surveillance agent for a single camera
VS
RTSPtoWebRTC
Low-latency RTSP camera streaming to browsers over WebRTC
| Feature | Kerberos Agent | RTSPtoWebRTC |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Video Surveillance | Video Surveillance |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Language | Go | JavaScript |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 512 MB | 128 MB |
| Deployment | docker, kubernetes | docker, binary |
| GitHub stars | ★ 1,088 | ★ 1,786 |
| First released | 2014 | 2020 |
| Replaces | Nest Cam | commercial camera viewer software |
Why pick each one
Choose Kerberos Agent if…
- Lightweight per-camera model
- Scales with orchestration
Choose RTSPtoWebRTC if…
- Released under the MIT license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Active community (1.8k GitHub stars)
- Written in JavaScript
Frequently asked questions
Is Kerberos Agent or RTSPtoWebRTC better?
Neither is universally better. RTSPtoWebRTC has the larger community; both share a medium setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.
Are Kerberos Agent and RTSPtoWebRTC free and open-source?
Yes. Kerberos Agent is licensed under MIT and RTSPtoWebRTC under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Kerberos Agent and RTSPtoWebRTC with Docker?
Kerberos Agent: yes. RTSPtoWebRTC: yes.