SHSelfHostIndex

Double Take vs RTSPtoWebRTC

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted video surveillance options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
DO Double Take Unified UI and API for face recognition on camera feeds VS RT RTSPtoWebRTC Low-latency RTSP camera streaming to browsers over WebRTC
FeatureDouble TakeRTSPtoWebRTC
CategoryVideo SurveillanceVideo Surveillance
LicenseMITMIT
LanguageJavaScriptJavaScript
Setup difficultyMediumMedium
Min. RAM512 MB128 MB
Deploymentdockerdocker, binary
GitHub stars★ 1,435★ 1,786
First released20212020
ReplacesNest Camcommercial camera viewer software

Why pick each one

Choose Double Take if…

  • Coordinates several detectors
  • Good Frigate companion
Double Take details

Choose RTSPtoWebRTC if…

  • Released under the MIT license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Active community (1.8k GitHub stars)
  • Written in JavaScript
RTSPtoWebRTC details

Frequently asked questions

Is Double Take or RTSPtoWebRTC better?

Neither is universally better. RTSPtoWebRTC has the larger community; both share a medium setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.

Are Double Take and RTSPtoWebRTC free and open-source?

Yes. Double Take is licensed under MIT and RTSPtoWebRTC under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Double Take and RTSPtoWebRTC with Docker?

Double Take: yes. RTSPtoWebRTC: yes.

Related comparisons