SHSelfHostIndex

WebRTC Camera vs Kerberos Agent

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted video surveillance options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
WE WebRTC Camera Low-latency camera streaming integration for Home Assistant VS KE Kerberos Agent Lightweight video surveillance agent for a single camera
FeatureWebRTC CameraKerberos Agent
CategoryVideo SurveillanceVideo Surveillance
LicenseMITMIT
LanguageJavaScriptGo
Setup difficultyMediumMedium
Min. RAM256 MB512 MB
Deploymentsourcedocker, kubernetes
GitHub stars★ 2,161★ 1,088
First released20212014
ReplacesCloud camera streamingNest Cam

Why pick each one

Choose WebRTC Camera if…

  • Very low latency
  • Local and private
WebRTC Camera details

Choose Kerberos Agent if…

  • Lightweight per-camera model
  • Scales with orchestration
Kerberos Agent details

Frequently asked questions

Is WebRTC Camera or Kerberos Agent better?

Neither is universally better. WebRTC Camera has the larger community; both share a medium setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.

Are WebRTC Camera and Kerberos Agent free and open-source?

Yes. WebRTC Camera is licensed under MIT and Kerberos Agent under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run WebRTC Camera and Kerberos Agent with Docker?

WebRTC Camera: check the project docs for container support. Kerberos Agent: yes.

Related comparisons