SHSelfHostIndex

Camera.UI vs Kerberos Agent

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted video surveillance options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
CA Camera.UI Web interface and NVR for RTSP and camera streams VS KE Kerberos Agent Lightweight video surveillance agent for a single camera
FeatureCamera.UIKerberos Agent
CategoryVideo SurveillanceVideo Surveillance
LicenseMITMIT
LanguageTypeScriptGo
Setup difficultyMediumMedium
Min. RAM1,024 MB512 MB
Deploymentdocker, bare-metaldocker, kubernetes
GitHub stars★ 1,083★ 1,088
First released20212014
ReplacesNest CamNest Cam

Why pick each one

Choose Camera.UI if…

  • Released under the MIT license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Active community (1.1k GitHub stars)
  • Written in TypeScript
Camera.UI details

Choose Kerberos Agent if…

  • Lightweight per-camera model
  • Scales with orchestration
Kerberos Agent details

Frequently asked questions

Is Camera.UI or Kerberos Agent better?

Neither is universally better. Kerberos Agent has the larger community; both share a medium setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.

Are Camera.UI and Kerberos Agent free and open-source?

Yes. Camera.UI is licensed under MIT and Kerberos Agent under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Camera.UI and Kerberos Agent with Docker?

Camera.UI: yes. Kerberos Agent: yes.

Related comparisons