Kapacitor vs Uptime Kuma

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted monitoring & status options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureKapacitorUptime Kuma
CategoryMonitoring & StatusMonitoring & Status
LicenseMITMIT
LanguageGoJavaScript
Setup difficultyMediumEasy
Min. RAM512 MB256 MB
Deploymentdocker, bare-metal, binarydocker
GitHub stars★ 2,373★ 89,960
First released20152021
ReplacesDatadog Monitors, Splunk ITSIPingdom, UptimeRobot

Why pick each one

Choose Kapacitor if…

  • Tight InfluxDB integration
  • Flexible alert routing
Kapacitor details

Choose Uptime Kuma if…

  • Very easy to use
  • Great notifications
  • Lightweight
Uptime Kuma details

Frequently asked questions

Is Kapacitor or Uptime Kuma better?

Uptime Kuma is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider Kapacitor if its specific feature set fits your needs better.

Are Kapacitor and Uptime Kuma free and open-source?

Yes. Kapacitor is licensed under MIT and Uptime Kuma under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Kapacitor and Uptime Kuma with Docker?

Kapacitor: yes. Uptime Kuma: yes.

Related comparisons