Beszel vs Kapacitor

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted monitoring & status options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureBeszelKapacitor
CategoryMonitoring & StatusMonitoring & Status
LicenseMITMIT
LanguageGoGo
Setup difficultyEasyMedium
Min. RAM128 MB512 MB
Deploymentdocker, binarydocker, bare-metal, binary
GitHub stars★ 24,108★ 2,373
First released20242015
ReplacesUptimeRobotDatadog Monitors, Splunk ITSI

Why pick each one

Choose Beszel if…

  • Extremely lightweight
  • Simple multi-host view
  • Easy setup
Beszel details

Choose Kapacitor if…

  • Tight InfluxDB integration
  • Flexible alert routing
Kapacitor details

Frequently asked questions

Is Beszel or Kapacitor better?

Beszel is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider Kapacitor if its specific feature set fits your needs better.

Are Beszel and Kapacitor free and open-source?

Yes. Beszel is licensed under MIT and Kapacitor under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Beszel and Kapacitor with Docker?

Beszel: yes. Kapacitor: yes.

Related comparisons