Kanidm vs ZITADEL

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted identity & sso options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureKanidmZITADEL
Deploy effortUnder-an-hour setupUnder-an-hour setup
Health score90 · Excellent95 · Excellent
CategoryIdentity & SSOIdentity & SSO
LicenseMPL-2.0Apache-2.0
LanguageRustGo
Setup difficultyMediumMedium
Min. RAM256 MB512 MB
Deploymentdocker, binarydocker, kubernetes, binary
GitHub stars★ 5,404★ 15,083
First released20192020
ReplacesActive Directory, OktaAuth0, Okta, Firebase Auth

What are Kanidm and ZITADEL?

Kanidm

Kanidm is an identity management platform written in Rust, focused on simplicity, security and correctness. It provides authentication for web applications, Unix systems and LDAP-aware services.

  • OAuth2 and OpenID Connect provider
  • Passkey-first authentication
  • Unix and LDAP integration
  • Strong security defaults

Read the full Kanidm guide →

ZITADEL

ZITADEL is an open-source identity and access management platform built for multi-tenant applications. It offers OpenID Connect, OAuth2, SAML, passwordless login and a powerful management API.

  • Multi-tenancy as a first-class concept
  • Passwordless and FIDO2 authentication
  • Event-sourced audit trail
  • Comprehensive gRPC and REST APIs

Read the full ZITADEL guide →

Kanidm vs ZITADEL: key differences

Kanidm is written in Rust, while ZITADEL is built with Go. Licensing differs — MPL-2.0 for Kanidm versus Apache-2.0 for ZITADEL. Kanidm is the lighter option, starting around 256 MB of RAM against 512 MB for ZITADEL. ZITADEL has the considerably larger community, at 15,083 GitHub stars versus 5,404.

Why pick each one

Choose Kanidm if…

  • Memory safe and lightweight
  • Excellent passwordless support

Watch out for

  • Smaller ecosystem and tooling
Kanidm details

Choose ZITADEL if…

  • Strong multi-tenant model
  • Modern Go codebase

Watch out for

  • Smaller community than Keycloak
ZITADEL details

Frequently asked questions

Is Kanidm or ZITADEL better?

Neither is universally better. ZITADEL has the larger community; both share a medium setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.

Are Kanidm and ZITADEL free and open-source?

Yes. Kanidm is licensed under MPL-2.0 and ZITADEL under Apache-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Kanidm and ZITADEL with Docker?

Kanidm: yes. ZITADEL: yes.

Which is lighter on resources, Kanidm or ZITADEL?

Kanidm has the smaller minimum footprint at 256 MB of RAM, compared to about 512 MB for ZITADEL. Real-world usage depends on library size, user count, and enabled features.

Related comparisons