Kan vs Vikunja

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted project management & tasks options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureKanVikunja
Deploy effortUnder-an-hour setupUnder-an-hour setup
Health score88 · Excellent90 · Excellent
CategoryProject Management & TasksProject Management & Tasks
LicenseAGPL-3.0AGPL-3.0
LanguageTypeScriptGo
Setup difficultyMediumEasy
Min. RAM512 MB256 MB
Deploymentdocker, sourcedocker, binary
GitHub stars★ 5,684★ 5,482
First released20242019
ReplacesTrelloTodoist, Trello, Asana

What are Kan and Vikunja?

Kan

Kan is an open-source, self-hosted kanban board application positioned as a Trello alternative. Built with TypeScript, it offers boards, lists, labels, member collaboration, and public board sharing in a modern web interface.

  • Trello-style kanban boards
  • Labels and members
  • Public board sharing
  • Modern responsive UI

Vikunja

Vikunja is an open-source to-do app and project management tool with lists, kanban, gantt, and calendar views. It targets individuals and teams wanting flexible task management. It is deployed via Docker or a single binary.

  • List, kanban, gantt and calendar views
  • Reminders and recurring tasks
  • REST API
  • Lightweight single binary

Read the full Vikunja guide →

Kan vs Vikunja: key differences

Kan is written in TypeScript, while Vikunja is built with Go. Vikunja is the lighter option, starting around 256 MB of RAM against 512 MB for Kan. Vikunja is the more established project (first released 2019), while Kan arrived in 2024.

Why pick each one

Choose Kan if…

  • Released under the AGPL-3.0 license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Mature project with 5.7k GitHub stars
  • Written in TypeScript
Kan details

Choose Vikunja if…

  • Flexible task views
  • Lightweight
  • Good API

Watch out for

  • Smaller ecosystem
  • Fewer integrations than rivals
Vikunja details

Frequently asked questions

Is Kan or Vikunja better?

Neither is universally better. Kan has the larger community, while Vikunja is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.

Are Kan and Vikunja free and open-source?

Yes. Kan is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and Vikunja under AGPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Kan and Vikunja with Docker?

Kan: yes. Vikunja: yes.

Which is lighter on resources, Kan or Vikunja?

Vikunja has the smaller minimum footprint at 256 MB of RAM, compared to about 512 MB for Kan. Real-world usage depends on library size, user count, and enabled features.

Related comparisons