Focalboard vs Vikunja

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted project management & tasks options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureFocalboardVikunja
Deploy effortUnder-an-hour setupUnder-an-hour setup
Health score69 · Good90 · Excellent
CategoryProject Management & TasksProject Management & Tasks
LicenseMITAGPL-3.0
LanguageTypeScriptGo
Setup difficultyEasyEasy
Min. RAM512 MB256 MB
Deploymentdocker, bare-metaldocker, binary
GitHub stars★ 26,483★ 5,494
First released20212019
ReplacesTrello, Asana, NotionTodoist, Trello, Asana

What are Focalboard and Vikunja?

Focalboard

Focalboard is an open-source project management tool with kanban boards, tables, and calendar views for organizing work. It targets teams wanting a self-hosted Trello-style board. It is deployed via Docker or as part of Mattermost.

  • Kanban, table and calendar views
  • Personal and team boards
  • Integrates with Mattermost
  • Templates for common workflows

Read the full Focalboard guide →

Vikunja

Vikunja is an open-source to-do app and project management tool with lists, kanban, gantt, and calendar views. It targets individuals and teams wanting flexible task management. It is deployed via Docker or a single binary.

  • List, kanban, gantt and calendar views
  • Reminders and recurring tasks
  • REST API
  • Lightweight single binary

Read the full Vikunja guide →

Focalboard vs Vikunja: key differences

Focalboard is written in TypeScript, while Vikunja is built with Go. Licensing differs — MIT for Focalboard versus AGPL-3.0 for Vikunja. Vikunja is the lighter option, starting around 256 MB of RAM against 512 MB for Focalboard. Vikunja is the more established project (first released 2019), while Focalboard arrived in 2021. Focalboard has the considerably larger community, at 26,483 GitHub stars versus 5,494.

Why pick each one

Choose Focalboard if…

  • Clean Trello-like UI
  • Lightweight
  • Mattermost integration

Watch out for

  • Development has slowed
  • Fewer power features
Focalboard details

Choose Vikunja if…

  • Flexible task views
  • Lightweight
  • Good API

Watch out for

  • Smaller ecosystem
  • Fewer integrations than rivals
Vikunja details

Frequently asked questions

Is Focalboard or Vikunja better?

Neither is universally better. Focalboard has the larger community; both share a easy setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.

Are Focalboard and Vikunja free and open-source?

Yes. Focalboard is licensed under MIT and Vikunja under AGPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Focalboard and Vikunja with Docker?

Focalboard: yes. Vikunja: yes.

Which is lighter on resources, Focalboard or Vikunja?

Vikunja has the smaller minimum footprint at 256 MB of RAM, compared to about 512 MB for Focalboard. Real-world usage depends on library size, user count, and enabled features.

Related comparisons