Joplin vs Shaarli

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted apps from related categories — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureJoplinShaarli
CategoryNotes & Knowledge BaseBookmarks & Read-It-Later
LicenseAGPL-3.0GPL-3.0
LanguageTypeScriptPHP
Setup difficultyEasyEasy
Min. RAM256 MB128 MB
Deploymentdocker, bare-metaldocker, bare-metal
GitHub stars★ 55,856★ 3,888
First released20172013
ReplacesEvernote, OneNotePocket, Delicious

Why pick each one

Choose Joplin if…

  • Strong privacy with E2EE
  • Flexible sync options
  • Active development
Joplin details

Choose Shaarli if…

  • Extremely lightweight
  • Easy to back up
  • Can be public or private
Shaarli details

Frequently asked questions

Is Joplin or Shaarli better?

Neither is universally better. Joplin has the larger community; both share a easy setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.

Are Joplin and Shaarli free and open-source?

Yes. Joplin is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and Shaarli under GPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Joplin and Shaarli with Docker?

Joplin: yes. Shaarli: yes.

Related comparisons