Joplin vs Floccus
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted apps from related categories — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Joplin
Open-source note-taking and to-do app with sync
VS
Floccus
Sync your browser bookmarks across browsers and devices
| Feature | Joplin | Floccus |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Notes & Knowledge Base | Bookmarks & Read-It-Later |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | MPL-2.0 |
| Language | TypeScript | JavaScript |
| Setup difficulty | Easy | Easy |
| Min. RAM | 256 MB | 64 MB |
| Deployment | docker, bare-metal | source |
| GitHub stars | ★ 55,856 | ★ 8,322 |
| First released | 2017 | 2015 |
| Replaces | Evernote, OneNote | Raindrop.io, Chrome Sync |
Why pick each one
Choose Floccus if…
- Released under the MPL-2.0 license
- Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
- Mature project with 8.3k GitHub stars
- Written in JavaScript
Frequently asked questions
Is Joplin or Floccus better?
Neither is universally better. Joplin has the larger community; both share a easy setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.
Are Joplin and Floccus free and open-source?
Yes. Joplin is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and Floccus under MPL-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Joplin and Floccus with Docker?
Joplin: yes. Floccus: check the project docs for container support.