InfluxDB vs Pushgateway

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted monitoring & status options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureInfluxDBPushgateway
CategoryMonitoring & StatusMonitoring & Status
LicenseMITApache-2.0
LanguageRustGo
Setup difficultyMediumEasy
Min. RAM512 MB32 MB
Deploymentdocker, kubernetes, binarydocker, kubernetes, binary
GitHub stars★ 31,683★ 3,356
First released20132015
ReplacesDatadog, AWS TimestreamDatadog

Why pick each one

Choose InfluxDB if…

  • Excellent for IoT and metrics
  • Rich tooling and integrations
InfluxDB details

Choose Pushgateway if…

  • Solves batch job monitoring
  • Simple to run
Pushgateway details

Frequently asked questions

Is InfluxDB or Pushgateway better?

Neither is universally better. InfluxDB has the larger community, while Pushgateway is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.

Are InfluxDB and Pushgateway free and open-source?

Yes. InfluxDB is licensed under MIT and Pushgateway under Apache-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run InfluxDB and Pushgateway with Docker?

InfluxDB: yes. Pushgateway: yes.

Related comparisons