Infisical vs Passky Server
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted password managers options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Infisical
Open-source secrets management platform for developers
VS
Passky Server
Simple, lightweight and open-source password manager backend
| Feature | Infisical | Passky Server |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Password Managers | Password Managers |
| License | MIT | GPL-3.0 |
| Language | TypeScript | PHP |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Easy |
| Min. RAM | 512 MB | 128 MB |
| Deployment | docker, kubernetes, helm | docker, bare-metal |
| GitHub stars | ★ 28,613 | ★ 243 |
| First released | 2022 | 2021 |
| Replaces | AWS Secrets Manager, Doppler, HashiCorp Vault | LastPass, Bitwarden |
Why pick each one
Frequently asked questions
Is Infisical or Passky Server better?
Neither is universally better. Infisical has the larger community, while Passky Server is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.
Are Infisical and Passky Server free and open-source?
Yes. Infisical is licensed under MIT and Passky Server under GPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Infisical and Passky Server with Docker?
Infisical: yes. Passky Server: yes.