Bitwarden vs Passky Server
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted password managers options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Bitwarden
Open-source password manager you can self-host
VS
Passky Server
Simple, lightweight and open-source password manager backend
| Feature | Bitwarden | Passky Server |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Password Managers | Password Managers |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | GPL-3.0 |
| Language | C# | PHP |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Easy |
| Min. RAM | 2,048 MB | 128 MB |
| Deployment | docker | docker, bare-metal |
| GitHub stars | ★ 19,782 | ★ 243 |
| First released | 2016 | 2021 |
| Replaces | 1Password, LastPass, Dashlane | LastPass, Bitwarden |
Why pick each one
Frequently asked questions
Is Bitwarden or Passky Server better?
Neither is universally better. Bitwarden has the larger community, while Passky Server is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.
Are Bitwarden and Passky Server free and open-source?
Yes. Bitwarden is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and Passky Server under GPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Bitwarden and Passky Server with Docker?
Bitwarden: yes. Passky Server: yes.