git-crypt vs Infisical
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted password managers options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
git-crypt
Transparent file encryption for secrets stored in git
VS
Infisical
Open-source secrets management platform for developers
| Feature | git-crypt | Infisical |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Password Managers | Password Managers |
| License | GPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Language | C++ | TypeScript |
| Setup difficulty | Easy | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 32 MB | 512 MB |
| Deployment | binary, source | docker, kubernetes, helm |
| GitHub stars | ★ 9,837 | ★ 28,613 |
| First released | 2013 | 2022 |
| Replaces | HashiCorp Vault, AWS Secrets Manager | AWS Secrets Manager, Doppler, HashiCorp Vault |
Why pick each one
Frequently asked questions
Is git-crypt or Infisical better?
Neither is universally better. Infisical has the larger community, while git-crypt is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.
Are git-crypt and Infisical free and open-source?
Yes. git-crypt is licensed under GPL-3.0 and Infisical under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run git-crypt and Infisical with Docker?
git-crypt: check the project docs for container support. Infisical: yes.