Infisical vs Knox
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted password managers options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Infisical
Open-source secrets management platform for developers
VS
Knox
Service for storing and rotating application secrets
| Feature | Infisical | Knox |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Password Managers | Password Managers |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Language | TypeScript | Go |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 512 MB | 256 MB |
| Deployment | docker, kubernetes, helm | docker, binary, source |
| GitHub stars | ★ 28,613 | ★ 1,268 |
| First released | 2022 | 2016 |
| Replaces | AWS Secrets Manager, Doppler, HashiCorp Vault | HashiCorp Vault, AWS Secrets Manager |
Why pick each one
Frequently asked questions
Is Infisical or Knox better?
Neither is universally better. Infisical has the larger community; both share a medium setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.
Are Infisical and Knox free and open-source?
Yes. Infisical is licensed under MIT and Knox under Apache-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Infisical and Knox with Docker?
Infisical: yes. Knox: yes.