git-crypt vs Passky Server
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted password managers options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
git-crypt
Transparent file encryption for secrets stored in git
VS
Passky Server
Simple, lightweight and open-source password manager backend
| Feature | git-crypt | Passky Server |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Password Managers | Password Managers |
| License | GPL-3.0 | GPL-3.0 |
| Language | C++ | PHP |
| Setup difficulty | Easy | Easy |
| Min. RAM | 32 MB | 128 MB |
| Deployment | binary, source | docker, bare-metal |
| GitHub stars | ★ 9,837 | ★ 243 |
| First released | 2013 | 2021 |
| Replaces | HashiCorp Vault, AWS Secrets Manager | LastPass, Bitwarden |
Why pick each one
Frequently asked questions
Is git-crypt or Passky Server better?
Neither is universally better. git-crypt has the larger community; both share a easy setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.
Are git-crypt and Passky Server free and open-source?
Yes. git-crypt is licensed under GPL-3.0 and Passky Server under GPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run git-crypt and Passky Server with Docker?
git-crypt: check the project docs for container support. Passky Server: yes.