Icinga Web 2 vs Grafana Loki

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted monitoring & status options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureIcinga Web 2Grafana Loki
CategoryMonitoring & StatusMonitoring & Status
LicenseGPL-2.0AGPL-3.0
LanguagePHPGo
Setup difficultyMediumMedium
Min. RAM512 MB512 MB
Deploymentdocker, bare-metal, sourcedocker, kubernetes, helm
GitHub stars★ 839★ 28,687
First released20142018
ReplacesNagios XI, op5 MonitorSplunk, Datadog Logs

Why pick each one

Choose Icinga Web 2 if…

  • Fast and lightweight UI
  • Strong module ecosystem
Icinga Web 2 details

Choose Grafana Loki if…

  • Cheap to run compared to full-text indexers
  • Familiar Prometheus-style labels
Grafana Loki details

Frequently asked questions

Is Icinga Web 2 or Grafana Loki better?

Neither is universally better. Grafana Loki has the larger community; both share a medium setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.

Are Icinga Web 2 and Grafana Loki free and open-source?

Yes. Icinga Web 2 is licensed under GPL-2.0 and Grafana Loki under AGPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Icinga Web 2 and Grafana Loki with Docker?

Icinga Web 2: yes. Grafana Loki: yes.

Related comparisons