Grafana vs Icinga Web 2

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted monitoring & status options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureGrafanaIcinga Web 2
CategoryMonitoring & StatusMonitoring & Status
LicenseAGPL-3.0GPL-2.0
LanguageTypeScriptPHP
Setup difficultyMediumMedium
Min. RAM512 MB512 MB
Deploymentdocker, bare-metal, helmdocker, bare-metal, source
GitHub stars★ 76,153★ 839
First released20142014
ReplacesDatadogNagios XI, op5 Monitor

Why pick each one

Choose Grafana if…

  • Beautiful flexible dashboards
  • Broad data source support
  • Strong community
Grafana details

Choose Icinga Web 2 if…

  • Fast and lightweight UI
  • Strong module ecosystem
Icinga Web 2 details

Frequently asked questions

Is Grafana or Icinga Web 2 better?

Neither is universally better. Grafana has the larger community; both share a medium setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.

Are Grafana and Icinga Web 2 free and open-source?

Yes. Grafana is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and Icinga Web 2 under GPL-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Grafana and Icinga Web 2 with Docker?

Grafana: yes. Icinga Web 2: yes.

Related comparisons