Beszel vs Icinga Web 2

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted monitoring & status options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureBeszelIcinga Web 2
CategoryMonitoring & StatusMonitoring & Status
LicenseMITGPL-2.0
LanguageGoPHP
Setup difficultyEasyMedium
Min. RAM128 MB512 MB
Deploymentdocker, binarydocker, bare-metal, source
GitHub stars★ 24,108★ 839
First released20242014
ReplacesUptimeRobotNagios XI, op5 Monitor

Why pick each one

Choose Beszel if…

  • Extremely lightweight
  • Simple multi-host view
  • Easy setup
Beszel details

Choose Icinga Web 2 if…

  • Fast and lightweight UI
  • Strong module ecosystem
Icinga Web 2 details

Frequently asked questions

Is Beszel or Icinga Web 2 better?

Beszel is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider Icinga Web 2 if its specific feature set fits your needs better.

Are Beszel and Icinga Web 2 free and open-source?

Yes. Beszel is licensed under MIT and Icinga Web 2 under GPL-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Beszel and Icinga Web 2 with Docker?

Beszel: yes. Icinga Web 2: yes.

Related comparisons