InfluxDB vs Grafana Loki

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted monitoring & status options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureInfluxDBGrafana Loki
CategoryMonitoring & StatusMonitoring & Status
LicenseMITAGPL-3.0
LanguageRustGo
Setup difficultyMediumMedium
Min. RAM512 MB512 MB
Deploymentdocker, kubernetes, binarydocker, kubernetes, helm
GitHub stars★ 31,683★ 28,687
First released20132018
ReplacesDatadog, AWS TimestreamSplunk, Datadog Logs

Why pick each one

Choose InfluxDB if…

  • Excellent for IoT and metrics
  • Rich tooling and integrations
InfluxDB details

Choose Grafana Loki if…

  • Cheap to run compared to full-text indexers
  • Familiar Prometheus-style labels
Grafana Loki details

Frequently asked questions

Is InfluxDB or Grafana Loki better?

Neither is universally better. InfluxDB has the larger community; both share a medium setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.

Are InfluxDB and Grafana Loki free and open-source?

Yes. InfluxDB is licensed under MIT and Grafana Loki under AGPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run InfluxDB and Grafana Loki with Docker?

InfluxDB: yes. Grafana Loki: yes.

Related comparisons