SHSelfHostIndex

HyperDX vs Highlight.io

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted apps from related categories — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
HY HyperDX Open-source observability for logs, traces, and session replay VS HI Highlight.io Open-source session replay and product monitoring
FeatureHyperDXHighlight.io
CategoryMonitoring & StatusWeb Analytics
LicenseMITApache-2.0
LanguageTypeScriptTypeScript
Setup difficultyMediumHard
Min. RAM1,024 MB4,096 MB
Deploymentdocker, kubernetes, helmdocker, kubernetes
GitHub stars★ 9,808★ 9,357
First released20232021
ReplacesDatadog, SentryLogRocket, Sentry

Why pick each one

Choose HyperDX if…

  • Session replay correlation
  • Developer-focused UX
HyperDX details

Choose Highlight.io if…

  • Unified front-end observability
  • Self-hostable
Highlight.io details

Frequently asked questions

Is HyperDX or Highlight.io better?

HyperDX is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler medium setup. Consider Highlight.io if its specific feature set fits your needs better.

Are HyperDX and Highlight.io free and open-source?

Yes. HyperDX is licensed under MIT and Highlight.io under Apache-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run HyperDX and Highlight.io with Docker?

HyperDX: yes. Highlight.io: yes.

Related comparisons