GlitchTip vs Highlight.io
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted apps from related categories — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
GlitchTip
Open-source error tracking and performance monitoring
VS
Highlight.io
Open-source session replay and product monitoring
| Feature | GlitchTip | Highlight.io |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Developer Tools & Git | Web Analytics |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Language | Python | TypeScript |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Hard |
| Min. RAM | 1,024 MB | 4,096 MB |
| Deployment | docker, kubernetes | docker, kubernetes |
| GitHub stars | ★ 1,300 | ★ 9,357 |
| First released | 2020 | 2021 |
| Replaces | Sentry, Bugsnag | LogRocket, Sentry |
Why pick each one
Frequently asked questions
Is GlitchTip or Highlight.io better?
Neither is universally better. Highlight.io has the larger community, while GlitchTip is simpler to set up (medium difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.
Are GlitchTip and Highlight.io free and open-source?
Yes. GlitchTip is licensed under MIT and Highlight.io under Apache-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run GlitchTip and Highlight.io with Docker?
GlitchTip: yes. Highlight.io: yes.