Errbit vs GlitchTip
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted apps from related categories — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Errbit
Self-hosted error catcher compatible with Airbrake
VS
GlitchTip
Open-source error tracking and performance monitoring
| Feature | Errbit | GlitchTip |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Monitoring & Status | Developer Tools & Git |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Language | Ruby | Python |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 512 MB | 1,024 MB |
| Deployment | docker, bare-metal | docker, kubernetes |
| GitHub stars | ★ 4,270 | ★ 1,300 |
| First released | 2011 | 2020 |
| Replaces | Airbrake, Sentry | Sentry, Bugsnag |
Why pick each one
Frequently asked questions
Is Errbit or GlitchTip better?
Neither is universally better. Errbit has the larger community; both share a medium setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.
Are Errbit and GlitchTip free and open-source?
Yes. Errbit is licensed under MIT and GlitchTip under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Errbit and GlitchTip with Docker?
Errbit: yes. GlitchTip: yes.