Errbit vs Grafana Faro
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted monitoring & status options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Errbit
Self-hosted error catcher compatible with Airbrake
VS
Grafana Faro
Frontend observability SDK and collector
| Feature | Errbit | Grafana Faro |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Monitoring & Status | Monitoring & Status |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Language | Ruby | TypeScript |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 512 MB | 256 MB |
| Deployment | docker, bare-metal | docker, kubernetes |
| GitHub stars | ★ 4,270 | ★ 1,118 |
| First released | 2011 | 2022 |
| Replaces | Airbrake, Sentry | Sentry, LogRocket |
Why pick each one
Choose Grafana Faro if…
- Released under the Apache-2.0 license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Kubernetes-ready with Helm charts available
- Active community (1.1k GitHub stars)
Frequently asked questions
Is Errbit or Grafana Faro better?
Neither is universally better. Errbit has the larger community; both share a medium setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.
Are Errbit and Grafana Faro free and open-source?
Yes. Errbit is licensed under MIT and Grafana Faro under Apache-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Errbit and Grafana Faro with Docker?
Errbit: yes. Grafana Faro: yes.