Errbit vs HyperDX
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted monitoring & status options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
HyperDX
Open-source observability for logs, traces, and session replay
| Feature | Errbit | HyperDX |
|---|---|---|
| Deploy effort | Under-an-hour setup | Under-an-hour setup |
| Health score | 89 · Excellent | 93 · Excellent |
| Category | Monitoring & Status | Monitoring & Status |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Language | Ruby | TypeScript |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 512 MB | 1,024 MB |
| Deployment | docker, bare-metal | docker, kubernetes, helm |
| GitHub stars | ★ 4,268 | ★ 9,912 |
| First released | 2011 | 2023 |
| Replaces | Airbrake, Sentry | Datadog, Sentry |
What are Errbit and HyperDX?
Errbit
Errbit is a self-hosted error catcher that collects exceptions from applications using the Airbrake API. It groups errors, tracks resolution, and notifies developers through issue trackers and chat.
- Airbrake-compatible error collection
- Error grouping and deduplication
- Issue tracker integration
- Notification rules
HyperDX
HyperDX is an open-source observability platform that correlates logs, metrics, traces, and session replays in one place. Built on OpenTelemetry and ClickHouse, it helps developers debug production issues quickly.
- Correlated logs, traces, and replays
- OpenTelemetry-native
- ClickHouse storage
- Full-text log search
Errbit vs HyperDX: key differences
Errbit is written in Ruby, while HyperDX is built with TypeScript. Errbit is the lighter option, starting around 512 MB of RAM against 1,024 MB for HyperDX. Errbit is the more established project (first released 2011), while HyperDX arrived in 2023. HyperDX has the considerably larger community, at 9,912 GitHub stars versus 4,268.
Why pick each one
Choose Errbit if…
- Long-established and stable
- Integrates with many trackers
Watch out for
- Airbrake API only
- Requires MongoDB
Choose HyperDX if…
- Session replay correlation
- Developer-focused UX
Watch out for
- Newer project
- Requires ClickHouse
Frequently asked questions
Is Errbit or HyperDX better?
Neither is universally better. HyperDX has the larger community; both share a medium setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.
Are Errbit and HyperDX free and open-source?
Yes. Errbit is licensed under MIT and HyperDX under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Errbit and HyperDX with Docker?
Errbit: yes. HyperDX: yes.
Which is lighter on resources, Errbit or HyperDX?
Errbit has the smaller minimum footprint at 512 MB of RAM, compared to about 1,024 MB for HyperDX. Real-world usage depends on library size, user count, and enabled features.