GlitchTip vs HyperDX
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted apps from related categories — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
GlitchTip
Open-source error tracking and performance monitoring
VS
HyperDX
Open-source observability for logs, traces, and session replay
| Feature | GlitchTip | HyperDX |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Developer Tools & Git | Monitoring & Status |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Language | Python | TypeScript |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 1,024 MB | 1,024 MB |
| Deployment | docker, kubernetes | docker, kubernetes, helm |
| GitHub stars | ★ 1,300 | ★ 9,808 |
| First released | 2020 | 2023 |
| Replaces | Sentry, Bugsnag | Datadog, Sentry |
Why pick each one
Frequently asked questions
Is GlitchTip or HyperDX better?
Neither is universally better. HyperDX has the larger community; both share a medium setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.
Are GlitchTip and HyperDX free and open-source?
Yes. GlitchTip is licensed under MIT and HyperDX under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run GlitchTip and HyperDX with Docker?
GlitchTip: yes. HyperDX: yes.