Hauk vs kepler.gl
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted maps & gis options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Hauk
Self-hosted real-time location sharing service
VS
kepler.gl
Open-source geospatial data visualization tool
| Feature | Hauk | kepler.gl |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Maps & GIS | Maps & GIS |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Language | Java | TypeScript |
| Setup difficulty | Easy | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 256 MB | 512 MB |
| Deployment | docker, bare-metal | bare-metal, source |
| GitHub stars | ★ 924 | ★ 11,954 |
| First released | 2019 | 2018 |
| Replaces | Google Maps location sharing | Tableau, ArcGIS |
Why pick each one
Choose Hauk if…
- Released under the Apache-2.0 license
- Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Written in Java
Choose kepler.gl if…
- Released under the MIT license
- Mature project with 12k GitHub stars
- Written in TypeScript
- Lightweight — runs in 512 MB RAM
Frequently asked questions
Is Hauk or kepler.gl better?
Neither is universally better. kepler.gl has the larger community, while Hauk is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.
Are Hauk and kepler.gl free and open-source?
Yes. Hauk is licensed under Apache-2.0 and kepler.gl under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Hauk and kepler.gl with Docker?
Hauk: yes. kepler.gl: check the project docs for container support.