GraphHopper vs kepler.gl
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted maps & gis options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
GraphHopper
Fast and flexible open-source routing engine
VS
kepler.gl
Open-source geospatial data visualization tool
| Feature | GraphHopper | kepler.gl |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Maps & GIS | Maps & GIS |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Language | Java | TypeScript |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 4,096 MB | 512 MB |
| Deployment | docker, bare-metal, binary | bare-metal, source |
| GitHub stars | ★ 6,619 | ★ 11,954 |
| First released | 2012 | 2018 |
| Replaces | Google Directions API | Tableau, ArcGIS |
Why pick each one
Choose GraphHopper if…
- Released under the Apache-2.0 license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Mature project with 6.6k GitHub stars
- Written in Java
Choose kepler.gl if…
- Released under the MIT license
- Mature project with 12k GitHub stars
- Written in TypeScript
- Lightweight — runs in 512 MB RAM
Frequently asked questions
Is GraphHopper or kepler.gl better?
Neither is universally better. kepler.gl has the larger community; both share a medium setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.
Are GraphHopper and kepler.gl free and open-source?
Yes. GraphHopper is licensed under Apache-2.0 and kepler.gl under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run GraphHopper and kepler.gl with Docker?
GraphHopper: yes. kepler.gl: check the project docs for container support.