AirTrail vs GraphHopper
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted maps & gis options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
AirTrail
Personal flight tracking system
VS
GraphHopper
Fast and flexible open-source routing engine
| Feature | AirTrail | GraphHopper |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Maps & GIS | Maps & GIS |
| License | GPL-3.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Language | TypeScript | Java |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 512 MB | 4,096 MB |
| Deployment | docker | docker, bare-metal, binary |
| GitHub stars | ★ 1,452 | ★ 6,619 |
| First released | 2026 | 2012 |
| Replaces | — | Google Directions API |
Why pick each one
Choose AirTrail if…
- Released under the GPL-3.0 license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Active community (1.5k GitHub stars)
- Written in TypeScript
Choose GraphHopper if…
- Released under the Apache-2.0 license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Mature project with 6.6k GitHub stars
- Written in Java
Frequently asked questions
Is AirTrail or GraphHopper better?
Neither is universally better. GraphHopper has the larger community; both share a medium setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.
Are AirTrail and GraphHopper free and open-source?
Yes. AirTrail is licensed under GPL-3.0 and GraphHopper under Apache-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run AirTrail and GraphHopper with Docker?
AirTrail: yes. GraphHopper: yes.