kepler.gl vs MapLibre GL JS

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted maps & gis options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
Featurekepler.glMapLibre GL JS
CategoryMaps & GISMaps & GIS
LicenseMITBSD-3-Clause
LanguageTypeScriptTypeScript
Setup difficultyMediumMedium
Min. RAM512 MB256 MB
Deploymentbare-metal, sourcesource, bare-metal
GitHub stars★ 11,954★ 11,304
First released20182020
ReplacesTableau, ArcGISMapbox GL JS, Google Maps JavaScript API

Why pick each one

Choose kepler.gl if…

  • Released under the MIT license
  • Mature project with 12k GitHub stars
  • Written in TypeScript
  • Lightweight — runs in 512 MB RAM
kepler.gl details

Choose MapLibre GL JS if…

  • Released under the BSD-3-Clause license
  • Mature project with 11.3k GitHub stars
  • Written in TypeScript
  • Tiny footprint — runs in 256 MB RAM
MapLibre GL JS details

Frequently asked questions

Is kepler.gl or MapLibre GL JS better?

Neither is universally better. kepler.gl has the larger community; both share a medium setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.

Are kepler.gl and MapLibre GL JS free and open-source?

Yes. kepler.gl is licensed under MIT and MapLibre GL JS under BSD-3-Clause. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run kepler.gl and MapLibre GL JS with Docker?

kepler.gl: check the project docs for container support. MapLibre GL JS: check the project docs for container support.

Related comparisons